ALERT!

This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).

Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock — Persistence and Progress

Saturday, May 18, 2024

Submitted by

Aristotle Protopapas

Source

Source Name: The New England Journal of Medicine

Source URL: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2312572

Author(s)

Jacob E. Møller, Thomas Engstrøm, Lisette O. Jensen, Hans Eiskjær, Norman Mangner, Amin Polzin, P. Christian Schulze, Carsten Skurk, Peter Nordbeck, Peter Clemmensen, Vasileios Panoulas, Sebastian Zimmer, Andreas Schäfer, Nikos Werner, Martin Frydland, Lene Holmvang, Jesper Kjærgaard, Rikke Sørensen, Jacob Lønborg, Matias G. Lindholm, Nanna L.J. Udesen, Anders Junker, Henrik Schmidt, Christian J. Terkelsen, Steffen Christensen, Evald H. Christiansen, Axel Linke, Felix J. Woitek, Ralf Westenfeld, Sven Möbius-Winkler, Kristian Wachtell, Hanne B. Ravn, Jens F. Lassen, Søren Boesgaard, Oke Gerke, and Christian Hassager

This article presents a succinct but comprehensive expert viewpoint on support in cardiogenic shock using the manuscript of the DanGer trial on promising results of Impella in a highly selected subgroup. With only 360 patients participating over one decade, the authors make the important point of careful selection for the procedure.

Search form

ALERT!

Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock — Persistence and Progress

Submitted by

Source

Author(s)

Add comment

Rate article

Share

Tags